Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02181
Original file (BC 2013 02181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02181
		COUNSEL: NO
		HEARING DESIRED: YES

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His military record be corrected to allow him to transfer his 
Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependent.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His transfer of Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits has been rejected as 
a result of continued and blatant prejudice against him during 
the period of Jan 11 to Apr 12, which resulted in his non-
selection to serve in a SELRES or Military Personnel 
Appropriation (MPA) tour of duty.  The prejudice against him was 
due to his impending Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) of 1 Jun 
12, that caused hiring managers and other key decision makers to 
not select him for any positions that he applied to and/or 
volunteered for. 

He is officially retired with no access to his Post-9/11 GI Bill 
benefits and no ability to transfer these benefits to his 
dependent son, which he earned through 30 years of service to 
his country.  

From Jan 11 to Apr 12, he went above and beyond, searched high 
and low and aggressively pursued any and all avenues and methods 
to secure a SELRES position or an MPA tour of duty to once again 
serve his country.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, copies of his retirement orders, Point History, AF 
IMTs 707A, Field Grade Officer Performance Report (Maj thru Col) 
and various other documents associated with his request.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 1 Jun 12, the applicant was assigned to the retired reserve 
section and placed on the Air Force Reserve Retired List. 

________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFRC/A1K recommends denial.  Any member of the Armed Forces, 
active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or 
after 1 Aug 09 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has 
at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of 
election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed 
Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-
9/11 benefits to their dependents (38 United States Code (USC), 
Chapter 33, Section 3319 (b) (1)).  38 USC, Chapter 33, Section 
3319 (f) (1) adds that the transfer of such entitlement can only 
be done while serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the 
transfer is executed.  Governing directives authorize the 
transfer only while participating either in the Active Duty or 
SELRES component.  Service members who are in the Individual 
Ready Reserve (IRR) are not eligible for transfer of benefits.  

On 31 Oct 08, the applicant voluntarily transferred from the 
SELRES to IRR status and retired on 1 Jun 12.  He transferred 
from the SELRES before the Post-9/11 Transfer of Benefits (TEB) 
was in effect.  

There is no provision to “grandfather” benefits to members who 
transferred before 1 Aug 09, the inception of the program.  In 
addition, the applicant contends there was continued and blatant 
prejudice in denying a return reassignment to the SELRES prior 
to retirement.  However, his request does not contain evidence 
to support his allegation.

The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 24 Jul 13, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has not received a 
response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  In 
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) 
involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that 
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2013-
02181 in Executive Session on 7 Mar 14, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Apr 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/A1K, dated 1 Jul 13.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jul 13. 




                                  .
                                  Panel Chair
                   



3

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01722

    Original file (BC-2011-01722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01722 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00917

    Original file (BC-2010-00917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01386

    Original file (BC-2013-01386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He read in the Air Force Times that individuals in similar situations were applying to the Board to have their records corrected. While we note the actions the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant he was not timely made aware of his eligibility for TEB and the steps necessary to transfer his benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05036

    Original file (BC-2012-05036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01354

    Original file (BC-2013-01354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A1Y states that the applicant did not apply for the transfer of benefits via the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) system and there is no application on file. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03776

    Original file (BC-2011-03776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant's last day on active duty was 31 Jul 09. The DTM and Air Force Instruction state the transfer must be made while the member is serving in the Armed Forces. While on terminal leave there were opportunities afforded members currently on terminal leave to extend their retirement effective date an additional 30 days in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04133

    Original file (BC-2010-04133.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He took several steps to gather information on transferring educational benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. There was limited information about the Post-9/11 GI Bill and even less on transferring educational benefits. Members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the SelRes on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient to “vest” them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02603

    Original file (BC-2012-02603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had he known about the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) he would have postponed his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01502

    Original file (BC-2012-01502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and in light of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00386

    Original file (BC-2013-00386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouse or children. A complete copy of the DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...